Human Design — Charts and Basics

Notes on the system, its vocabulary, and how a chart is read

Human Design is a framework that combines elements of astrology, the I Ching, the Hindu chakra system and the Kabbalistic Tree of Life into a single diagram called a bodygraph. It was first described in the late 1980s and has since grown a sizeable following among people interested in personality models.

These pages collect plain-language notes: what the parts of a chart are called, how the five types are distinguished, and what practitioners mean by terms such as strategy, authority and profile. Nothing here is a prediction, and none of it should be treated as medical, psychological or financial advice.

What a chart is built from

A bodygraph is calculated from a date, an exact time and a place of birth. Two calculations are made: one for the moment of birth and one for a point roughly three months earlier. The results are drawn as nine centres connected by thirty-six channels, each channel made of two gates.

The five types

Generator
Defined sacral centre. Described as responding to what is in front of them rather than initiating from nothing.
Manifesting Generator
A generator with a motor connected to the throat. Associated with working in bursts and with skipping steps.
Projector
No defined sacral centre, no motor to the throat. The usual advice is to wait for recognition before offering guidance.
Manifestor
A motor connected to the throat, sacral undefined. Associated with initiating, and with informing others beforehand.
Reflector
All nine centres undefined. Rare. Said to sample the mood of the people nearby rather than carry a fixed one.

Strategy and authority

Each type is given a strategy, a short rule of thumb about how to approach decisions. Alongside it sits authority, which points to the part of the chart a person is encouraged to consult first — the sacral response, an emotional wave, a quieter inner knowing, and so on. Much of the practical material in Human Design is built on these two ideas.

Reading the material critically

Human Design is not a scientific theory and does not claim empirical support. It is best approached the way one approaches any typology: as a vocabulary that some people find useful for describing themselves, not as a statement of fact about how anybody must behave. Where a source promises certainty, treat the promise, not the system, as the problem.

A short glossary